We just released a limited tech preview of Federated Auth via Azure AD. Thus, you can potentially use Azure MFA to solve this need.
We also have a native SMS 2FA capability in limited tech preview as well. You can learn about both these features at:
You can find more details here in the Authentication section: http://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-cloud/workspace-configuration.html
Please reach out your Citrix contact to get access to these features.
Thanks a lot for the feedback! This is a great idea. We will incorporate it into our backlog.
Thanks everyone for the feedback. We just released a limited tech preview of Federated Auth via Azure AD. You can find more details here: http://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-cloud/workspace-configuration.html
Hi David, thank you so much for your feedback. I will reach out to get more information on your requirements. Thanks. Jie
4 votesPlanned · 1 comment · Citrix Cloud » Citrix Cloud Plaftorm & Management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you Andy for the feedback.
Yes, we are working in that direction to have more action items implemented for each of the Library Offering.
Thanks for the feedback!
We do not support selection of folder for the VM being provisioned using Smart Tools. Currently the folder for the VM defaults to the Datacenter's vmFolder (This is a folder containing the compute resource for this Datacenter). A vSphere resource location can have multiple Datacenters.
We will add "folder/location section" to our roadmap.
I'm sorry to hear about your experience. Thanks for your feedback. We will work on it.
Great idea! Thanks for sharing. Your idea has been added to our feature backlog. Would you like to test some early prototypes?
Thanks for the feedback. It is on our priority list.
Thanks for your feedback. We are actively considering this feature. It is not available currently.
Thanks a lot for the feedback. It is on our roadmap to show the customer ID in the email report. I don't have a committed release for this yet. But it is a priority for us.
Good idea. We are looking into it. In the meantime, it is always recommended that customers test their VNET and domain controller settings by manually spinning up a machine and joining the machine to the domain in Azure Portal.
2 votesUnder Review · 1 comment · Citrix Cloud » XenApp and XenDesktop Service · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks for the feedback.
This does belong in the Cloud StoreFront management UI as an easily configurable option. I'll take it back to the team.
2 votesUnder Review · 6 comments · Citrix Cloud » License Usage Insights · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks for the additional feedback on this topic. We look forward to making progress in this area for LUI with an upcoming feature set that allows partners to:
1. Define customers in Citrix Cloud
2. Link LUI users/usage to customers, view monthly usage/users with a per-customer breakdown
3. Easily export users for each customer so it can be used for downstream per-customer billing
We do not yet have committed plans for automatically emailing monthly reports (or automatically reporting to a CSP distributor) though they are ongoing conversations.
Thanks and keep the feedback coming!
Good feedback and input - thanks.
We could approach this 2 ways:
1. Built-in email feature in LUI service that mails a monthly summary report.
2. API access to LUI service that CSPs could script against to provide their own automation or email mechanism.
I'll take it back to the team and be tracking email reports as a feature request.
Truly appreciate you weighing in on the service and features you'd like to see...
Good feedback. The 'old Citrix Usage Tool' (The Citrix Usage Collector) did not support any email based reports. Are you referring to CloudPortal Services Manager 'report mailer' functionality?
Thanks for the feedback. We're working on a few things license related including a view for partners into customer Citrix Cloud entitlements/orders, and down the line a clear view of licenses purchased vs. used.
9 votesStarted · 3 comments · Citrix Cloud » Citrix Cloud Plaftorm & Management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thanks for the feedback. We have these features about viewing the ticket history, adding comments and making changes in our roadmap.
Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.
This would fall under our “rule based assignment of users” roadmap item which is not yet in progress.
Domain pattern matching would be one of several rules that could match users and route them to paid vs. free usage categorization.
Thanks for the feedback. We're aligned on this use case as part of our "Rule based assignment of free users" roadmap. We can provide the @domain filter/rule based on the info provided form the CTXS license server.
In order to do something based on AD-Domain, we'd have to expand the LUI solution significantly and require partners to deploy the Citrix Cloud Connector so the LUI service can access their AD users and groups.
2 votes1 comment · Citrix Cloud » Citrix Cloud Plaftorm & Management · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
This is something that I have been thinking about for a while. can you elaborate on what the need is here to help define the feature. What are the main goals for you in seeing this information.
Changed title to be more descriptive
Thank you for your feedback!
Currently, to scale up, the Smart Scale algorithm first check to see if there are any machines in maintenance mode. If so, it will first take most loaded machines out of maintenance mode before powering on more machines. This way, it has the least number of machines powered on to deliver the required load.
I love to learn more about how you use Smart Scale and how we can further improve it. Would you be willing to have a quick conference call? I can be reached directly at email@example.com.
Product Manager, Citrix Lifecycle Management
Thanks for the feedback! Within Update and Smart Scale, select Site Details, and you have an option to "Remove Site". Alternatively, you can uninstall the Lifecycle Management Site agent on the machine.
Hi If you make each idea a sepaatre idea item they can be voted on individually and comments tracked individually.
1. Great suggestion - there are no plans for this at this time, but we have it logged here for future consideration.
2. Yes this is a priority, we have nothing to announce in terms of ETA at this time.
3. This can be achieved with StoreFront aggregation using the on-premises SF to do the aggregation